Professional Legal Services

International Criminal Law (ICL) is a branch of international law governing the criminal responsibility of individuals for the most serious crimes that threaten the international community as a whole. Its development reflects a gradual shift from the exclusive criminal jurisdiction of states to the recognition of individual international criminal responsibility.

1. Early Historical Origins
The idea of international responsibility for crimes has deep historical roots. As early as the Middle Ages, certain offenses were regarded as violations of jus gentium (the law of nations). One of the earliest precedents is the trial of Peter von Hagenbach (1474), who was held accountable by an international tribunal for crimes committed against civilians during an occupation. This case marked an early recognition of personal responsibility for violations of the laws of war.
In the modern era, natural law scholars – most notably Hugo Grotius -significantly contributed to the development of ICL by advancing the concept of individual responsibility for breaches of the laws and customs of war.

2. International Humanitarian Law as a Precursor
During the 19th century, the development of international humanitarian law played a decisive role in shaping international criminal law. The adoption of the Geneva Convention of 1864 and the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 laid the normative foundations for the criminalization of war crimes. Although these treaties did not establish permanent international criminal courts, they defined prohibited conduct and affirmed the principle of responsibility for violations.

3. World War I and Early Attempts to Criminalize Aggression
Following World War I, the first attempt was made to subject a head of state to international criminal responsibility. The Treaty of Versailles (1919) provided for the prosecution of Kaiser Wilhelm II for a “supreme offense against international morality and the sanctity of treaties.” Although no trial ultimately took place, this precedent represented an important step toward individual accountability for international crimes.

4. The Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals: A Turning Point
The true beginning of modern international criminal law is associated with the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (1945–1946) and the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (1946–1948).
The Nuremberg Tribunal established fundamental principles of ICL, including individual criminal responsibility for international crimes, the rejection of official immunity, and the inadmissibility of superior orders as an absolute defense. It codified three categories of crimes: crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

5. Codification and Institutional Stagnation (1948–1990s)
After Nuremberg, the principles of international criminal law were affirmed by resolutions of the UN General Assembly and codified by the UN International Law Commission. The adoption of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in 1948 marked the first universal treaty in the field of ICL.
Despite normative progress, political constraints during the Cold War prevented the establishment of a permanent international criminal court, resulting in a period of institutional stagnation.

6. Ad Hoc Tribunals and the Revival of ICL
In the 1990s, international criminal law experienced a revival in response to mass atrocities in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. This led to the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY, 1993) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR, 1994). These tribunals significantly advanced jurisprudence on genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.

7. The Rome Statute and the International Criminal Court
The culmination of the development of international criminal law was the adoption of the Rome Statute in 1998, which entered into force in 2002 and established the International Criminal Court (ICC). The ICC has jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression, which was definitively defined in 2010. International criminal law thus acquired a permanent institutional framework.

8. The Contemporary State of International Criminal Law
Today, international criminal law combines international judicial mechanisms, national jurisdiction based on the principle of universal jurisdiction, and the principle of complementarity between the ICC and states. ICL continues to evolve amid complex geopolitical challenges, while maintaining its core principle – individual accountability for the most serious international crimes.

Conclusion
International criminal law emerged in response to the gravest crimes against humanity and has gradually evolved into an autonomous branch of international law. Its development – from isolated historical precedents to a permanent international court – reflects the determination of the international community to ensure accountability for crimes that undermine the foundations of the international legal order.